This Monday the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that it had managed to destroy the S-300 aerial missile defense system donated by Slovakia in a series of bombings carried out on the outskirts of the province of Dnepropetrovskin the east of the country. The Ukrainian-made BTR-4 is a lightly armored, eight-wheeled vehicle weighing about 25 tons with a crew of three, which carries a squad of seven infantry. Butnowwere facing this lag and Russia is trying to exploit that time lag for its own benefit. In the clip, a voice can be heard accusing the Russian soldiers of "slamming" Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, The Post reported, adding that everyone in the clip spoke Russian. Access your favorite topics in a personalized feed while you're on the go. A Russian tank fires at point-blank range at a group of unsuspecting Ukrainian soldiers. By the characteristic whistle of the T64 engine is not heard. And why did they take the enemy tank for their own? No, brother. Diesel fuel is notoriously difficult to ignite and some tank designers actually put fuel tanks in front of vital components to protect them. What's the point of shooting from that distance? broforwin Ukrainian soldiers realize there's Russian soldiers still in a basement, they fire on it and throw grenades into it somewhere in Bakhmut area (Possibly older footage) Perhaps the Nazis also shot their own, who wanted to surrender. 2, This website follows the DNPA Code of Ethics. The T-72s ammunition storage is in the hull in the area struck, so the most likely explanation seems to be that this was hit enough times. Tears, defiance and new tanks in Ukraine for war anniversary. It is not a fact that warriors can distinguish between tanks. ", "I remind everyone that we are the European army of a European country," he wrote. We need reasonable support to Ukraine - not another spending bonanza that will lead to further inflation.Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia will not resume participation in the treaty until there is a change in the "attitude of the collective West.". “Democrats’ recent bill was 40 billion taxpayer dollars – billions more than the entire U.S. “We should support the Ukrainian people in their fight for freedom while also making sure we spend taxpayer funds with accountability,” Estes said. Vicky Hartzler and Billy Long, who are both running for U.S. While the bill passed the House of Representatives easily last week, 57 Republicans voted against the bill. It also contains $4 billion for “international disaster assistance,” which includes emergency food and shelter, and $8.7 billion for an “economic support fund,” which includes money to combat human trafficking in the region.īut some Republicans in Congress have pushed back on the spending. to give Ukraine $11 billion in weapons from its stockpile and gives the military at least $9 billion to buy new weapons to make up for the ones they have given Ukraine. The package is more than the $33 billion Biden requested and well beyond the $13 billion Congress gave to Ukraine earlier this year. It is squarely in our national interest to help Ukraine achieve victory in this war and to help Ukraine and other countries deter other wars of aggression before they start.” “Defending the principle of sovereignty, promoting stability in Europe, and imposing costs on Russia’s naked aggression have a direct and vital bearing on America’s national security and vital interests. “America’s support for Ukraine’s self-defense is not mere philanthropy,” McConnell said Saturday. McConnell has stressed his desire to quickly pass a bill that would help the country as the Russians have changed course and focused on capturing a southeastern region in the country. John Barasso- all Republicans - to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, traveled to Kyiv this past weekend alongside Sen. It’s about prioritizing American security and American interests.” “It neglects priorities at home (the border), allows Europe to freeload, short changes critical interests abroad and comes w/ no meaningful oversight. “Spending $40 billion on Ukraine aid - more than three times what all of Europe has spent combined - is not in America’s interests,” Hawley said on Twitter. They joined nine other Republicans in voting against a procedural motion to move the bill forward Monday evening. Hawley, a Missouri Republican, and Marshall, a Kansas Republican, have joined a small group of Republicans in the Senate who are pushing back against the spending, saying the money would be better spent in America than aiding the war effort in Europe. Josh Hawley and Roger Marshall will vote against a package providing an additional $40 billion in aid to Ukraine as the country has turned the tide in pushing back Russia’s invasion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |